The Human Rights Act provides a number of fundamental rights and freedoms that UK citizens are entitled to enjoy by law, unless those rights are expressly or implicitly taken away by law. For example, the right to liberty is qualified by the fact that a person’s liberty can be taken away by the state, such as through arrest or imprisonment. The important Article in the Human Rights Act for the purposes of child support is Article 8.
What Article 8 Means
Article 8 relates to the right that people should be entitled to a personal and family life, and provides protections from the State for someone’s home and correspondence. Article 8 freedoms are wide ranging, and incorporate a huge variety of a person’s existence. These include rights of transsexual people, the right to develop your own personality and, critically, the right to create relationships with others. As a result, a child has a right to have a relationship with his or her parents, siblings are entitled to know and see each other, and grandparents should be entitled to form relationships with their grandchildren.

Answer a few questions about your situation and get a clear summary of your child maintenance rights and options.
Try our Child Support Rights Checker free, here on this site →Privacy
Although there is a right to private life in Article 8, this right of privacy is not absolute. The State is entitled to interfere if necessary, but this can only be under circumstances. These are:
- the interference must be lawful
- there must be a reason for the interference
- the interference must be necessary in a democratic society
In terms of the reasons for the interference, it must not be gratuitous – but must be carried out in pursuance of an ‘identified legitimate aim.’ Therefore an individual’s privacy rights can be invaded on the grounds of:
- national security, economic well-being of the country, or public safety
- to protect rights and freedoms of others
- to prevent crime or disorder
- to protect health or morals.
Your situation may be slightly different. ask a question below ↓ and our editorial team will reply with our advice.
How Is Article 8 Used?
The Human Rights Act is commonly misinterpreted. The Act applies only to public bodies, rather than individuals. That means, therefore, that if your ex-partner is refusing to allow you to see your child you cannot then sue your ex-partner under Article 8. That said, the court is recognised as a public body. Legal challenges can be brought in other ways and the court can then be asked to protect your Article 8 rights. It would not be possible, however, to bring a claim against a private individual solely on the basis of Article 8.
This concept sometimes causes confusion, especially since high profile celebrities often bring court cases on the basis of ‘privacy’ (which is a concept protected by Article 8.) These cases are usually to do with a newspaper publishing intimate photographs or details of a celebrity’s private life that they do not consider should be in the public domain. In these circumstances, the celebrity in question will often bring the court case on the basis of ‘breach of confidence’ and then ask the court to enforce their Article 8 privacy rights.
there must be a reason for the interference, the interference must be necessary in a democratic society.
Firstly the CSA/CMS have this habit of false accounting and 9 times out of 10 harass you for money that is not actually owed thousands of pounds of fraudulent arrears, this is not lawful at all it is blatant fraud and misconduct, the correspondence they send if of a threatening nature and causes distress which constitutes a breach of the Malicious Communications Act 1988 sect 1. Secondly, this is not necessary interference in a democratic society when the public body is committing fraud against members of the public, this is not acceptable conduct of a public body when we allegedly live in a civilised and democratic society. The unlawful and draconian operations of the CSA/CMS is unconstitutional!
cutting it short , I applied for my SARs report ( freedom of information act ) , this proved I didn't owe anything, this was because I had received nothing in writing over the period from 2009 to 2011 , I had no information for 25 month.
After many emails to Arlene Sugden , head of the CSA ,or at least complaints , I get a phone call yesterday out of the blue.
After explaining what I had found in the report ,the man I was talking to , Derek , said I should not be having to pay as the claim against me was wrong.
All of a sudden , the phone went quiet, then Derek piped up again and said he has made a mistake , I believe they have someone sitting with them advising them in ways to get away with taking peoples money, he said that they didn't have to write to me , this was because they had contacted the DWP to check on my work status , I have suffered health problems for many years , what he told me I don't believe.
in the times i've spoken to anyone from the CSA/CMS , they have a habit of moving the goal posts when ever it suits them.
It has been known for many years that the CSA have been know for making bogus ,fraudulent claims , why is it they are allowed to get away with it, I would really love to know.
I explained to Derek , as a word of caution, that he or anyone else making fraudulent claims could get into deep trouble.
i have now made a request for any recordings of the phone discussions i have had with them,I will now wait to see if I receive anymore information.
name is not on the child birth certificate but know the child his his biological child want to see him once in a while doesn't want to listen to the main needs of the child and only wants to buy him toys and don't want to maintain the child financially what should I do?
Ask Child Support Laws a question
Ask our editorial team a question and we will reply with our advice. Tell us as much about your situation as you can: the more detail you give, the more useful our answer can be.
You do not need to use your real name. Please do not include your full address, phone number, email address, or the names of other people. We may edit or remove identifying details for privacy and legal reasons.
Comments are moderated before publication.